Iranian Journal Of Antheropology

Iranian Journal Of Antheropology

Bourdieu's Field in the Analysis of Contemporary Iranian Painting (The 1970s)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Department of Visual Arts, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Visual Arts, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
Abstract
Among the visual arts, painting holds a special place in depicting the social landscape of Iran. The 1970s in the history of contemporary Iranian painting was replete with social and visual changes. This decade, on one hand, saw the consolidation of modernist art and modern painting, and on the other hand, encompassed the art of the Islamic Revolution and subsequently the painting of the imposed war (Iran-Iraq War). In this context, Pierre Bourdieu's theory of field can be instrumental in explaining the reflections of power and social conditions in artistic developments. The present study aims to examine Bourdieu's field in contemporary Iranian painting (the 1970s) and seeks to answer the following question: How can the developments in the art field of contemporary Iranian painting (the 1970s) be explained based on Bourdieu's field theory? Data were collected through library research, using index cards and computer scanning equipment as data collection tools. The findings and results of this research indicate that the art field in contemporary Iranian painting during the 1970s was characterized by a power imbalance and a lack of uniform valuation throughout the decade. It involved, on one hand, the consolidation of the rules established in the 1960s art scene, and on the other hand, opposition to and displacement of the dominant rules, leading to the creation of combined and heterogeneous rules. Consequently, the diverse art field of the 1970s did not lead to any sustained or continuous movement in contemporary Iranian painting.
Keywords
Subjects

·       Bahmanipour, Azadeh & Afzal Tousi, Efatsadat. (2016). Propaganda in the Saqqakhaneh School Based on Pierre Bourdieu's Theories. Kimaye Honar (The Essence of Art), No. 19, pp. 71–88. (in Persian)
·       Bourdieu, P. (1993). The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature, New York: Columbia University Press.
·       Bourdieu, P. (2001). Theory of practice, practical reasons, and rational choice (M. Mardiha, Trans.). Tehran: Naqsh-o-Negar. (in Persian)
·       Bourdieu, P. (2010). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (H. Chavoshian, Trans.). Tehran: Sales Publishing. (in Persian)
·       Bourdieu, P.(1996). The Rules of Art, Translated by Susan Emanuel, Cambridge: Polity Press.
·       Bourdieu, P.(2006). British journal of sociology Education: Special Issue Pierre Bourdieu, The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature, Edited and introduced by Randal Johnson, Cambridge: Polity press,. Cultural field: Pages 76&77.
·       Bourdieu,P. (1993). The Field of Culctural Production, Edited and Introduced by Randal Johnson, Cambridge: Polity Press.
·       Chevrier, C., & Fontaine, O. (2005). Bourdieu’s glossary (M. Katbi, Trans.). Tehran: Ney Publishing.
·       Chaghand, Pegah & Rezazadeh, Taher. (2024). A Bourdieusian Analysis of Kamāl al-Molk's Artistic Decisions in the Iranian Art Field during the Qajar Era. Negareh Journal, No. 69, pp. 95–110. (in Persian)
·       Delzandeh, Siamak. (2015). Visual Transformations of Iranian Art (A Critical Study). Tehran: Nazar Publishing and Printing. (in Persian)
·       Grenfell, M. (2014). Key concepts of Pierre Bourdieu. Tehran: Afkar Publishing. (in Persian)Bourdieu, P.(1984). Distinction, Translated by: Richard Nice. London: Routledge& Kegan Paul Ltd.
·       Keshmirshekan, H. (2015). Contemporary art of Iran. Tehran: Nazar Publishing. (in Persian)
·       Lin, J. A. (2008). A critique and review of Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of artistic fields (M. Razavi, Trans.). Honar Quarterly, 78, 116–139. (in Persian)
·       Parastesh, Sh., & Mohammadi-Nejad, M. (2010). A social analysis of Kamal-ol-Molk’s artworks in the field of Iranian painting. Journal of Sociology of Art and Literature, 3, 103–134. (in Persian)
·       Pinto, L.(1996). The Theory of Field & Sociology of Literature: Reflections on the Work of
·       Ritzer, G. (1995). Sociological theories (A. R. Gharavizadeh, Trans.). Tehran: Jahad Daneshgahi Publications (Majd). (in Persian)
·       Shariati, S. (2005). A reflection on Pierre Bourdieu’s views on the sociology of art. Lecture Report, Sociology of Art Group, University of Tehran. (in Persian)
·       Salari, Maryam. (2022). Analysis of the Transformation of Linguistic Habitus in the Works of Protest Painters of the 1970s Utilizing Bourdieu's Concept of Strategy (Case Study of Works by Kazem Chalipa and Nosratollah Moslemian). Sociology and Literature, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 202–228. (in Persian)
·       Stones, R. (2000). Great sociological thinkers (M. Mirdamadi, Trans.). Tehran: Markaz Publishing. (in Persian)
·       Swartz,D. L. (2006). Pierre Bourdieu and North American political Sociology: Why he doesn’t fit in but should, French Political, 4, 84-99.